Please read first post first!
ericm wrote:Not really willing to read through the previous posts here, so here's my (so far) encountered errors in V15 of sc.3:
In Foothill, when I searched a cabinet, got "thereALLYS..." and some other text. Looks like it should have read "there lies.." or something.
When I talk to Cyclops, (at least in Foothill) the two responses are reversed; if I click no to his question, he gives me the explanation on dragons.
Salibu: 20/08/10 wrote:You have all been Swalched.
Kefka wrote:I have finished my run of Scenario 3 on patch v.16. I understand you're not as interested in a list of errors for Sc3 as much as you are regarding Sc1 and Sc2, but I plan to replay the three games getting the other characters (Jade/Garosh, Edmund/Produn) soon enough.
On that topic, should I wait for v.17 to be released to give you feedback on it?
There are a lot of images. I have added the location where the screenshot was taken directly on the image as requested.
There are too many images to post them all individually, so here is a link to the album on the first image relevant to Scenario 3. There are exactly 65 screenshots, so the last one will be #73
I hope this helps
Nope.Swalchy wrote:With regards to http://imgur.com/a/Gnzo3#10 - "is" is certainly the correct word compared to "was". This is in context of Julian, who is (present tense, third person, singular) seeking revenge against a Vandal (Galm in this case). He has yet to have revenge against Galm, so was (past tense, third person, singular) is the wrong word to use in this sentence.
Don't worry, there's a lot of nit-picking, as promised, and even a few personal comments.legalize freedom wrote:While 65 may sound like a lot, I don't think that's too bad for an entire unpolished scenario.
Bulzome wrote:I did find a few minor errors with V18.
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest