Which battle system would you prefer?
Geoffrey Duke @ Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:34 am) wrote: People have a habit of mistaking RPGs that sell extremely well with great RPGs. Even hardcore FF fans are pissed with the direction their favourite series has gone in. That just makes me laugh.
We might just have to accept the fact that in this age of big-budget games, there might not be any room left for a new 3D Shining Force tactical RPG. SF Neo disappointed a lot of people, but I'm beginning to wonder if Sega even took notice of that disappointment.
Geoffrey Duke @ Fri Dec 16, 2005 8:00 pm) wrote: I just wonder if Sega even realises that what we all really want is Shining Force IV, not some lame anime-laden Diablo-clone.
Geoffrey Duke @ Fri Dec 16, 2005 10:54 pm) wrote: All this makes me wonder how much a potential SF IV would sell. Knowing our luck, it would probably be made for a portable console.
You'd think Sega would have learned from the failure of SF Neo and the success of Disgaea and Fire Emblem by now.
Geoffrey Duke @ Sat Dec 17, 2005 6:36 pm) wrote: I haven't a clue. I'm just not very optimistic at the moment. I mean, even if they made SF IV for the PS2 *now* there's no way in hell it would reach the rest of the world now that the new consoles are coming out.
Sega screwed us with SF Neo, really.
Marky @ Thu Dec 22, 2005 12:37 am) wrote: I doubt Sega is even thinking about a Shining Force 4. Sega just continues with stupid mistakes.
I bet they will make a sequel to Neo (like Shining Soul II for Shining Soul I) without thinking about the quality of the game, its tie-in with the Shining World, and pleasure of actually playing it.
Neo flopped big.
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest